AW or .... for fitness purposes foremost.

morning!

searching high , low , honest, @ standstill because read contradicting itself. 1 watch @ 1 thing while other better , other worse. sound familiar?

competitive tennis player , looking tracker or watch measure output on court cross training in gym. need accurate in terms of calories burned, miles run (on court), hr, basics when comes fitness. same goes in gym. not want wear chest strap , prefer tracker or watch lightweight it's not bothering me while playing tennis. wear on non dominant hand while playing tennis, not sure if matters.

want able track progress app, have. fitbit has nice app, read majority of products breakdown in short amount of time. customer service seems replacing them, not want play return game when can of higher quality start. unless of course products should will.

have looked @ garmin, polar, fitbit, apple, , @ loss.

think i’m between aw3 , garmin vivosport 3.

help?

 

honestly, don't think consumer level device going accurate @ tracking activity in general. key whether device consistent.

in regards tracking mileage while playing tennis, think you'll disappointed in devices'tracking ability. there's little precision consumer gps.

aw can track hr relatively accurately. there, you'd have trust apple's algorithms convert data calories burned. think apple uses mets calculations, perhaps little secret sauce come calories.

have aw, can't comment on other devices in terms of weight , such. aw sport versions pretty light. wear on left hand , can hardly feel it. ss versions little heavier. if weight becomes issue tennis, can use armband can wear on forearm or bicep, hr readings too.

 

Forums Apple Watch Apple Watch

• iPhone
• Mac OS & System Software
• iPad
• Apple Watch
• Notebooks
• iTunes
• Apple ID
• iCloud
• Desktop Computers
• Apple Music
• Professional Applications
• iPod
• iWork
• Apple TV
• iLife
• Wireless